As a teacher, the way knowledge is delivered is teacher-centred. Teacher provides all the learning information and explanation. Student learns in a passive way with no or less critical thinking.
Teacher has more control in the learning process. I was a teacher in China before I came to NZ. Work as a teacher in China, sometimes you need to push student to achieve the learning outcomes. Teacher does take part of responsibility to help student achieve learning goals, especially when work with young children. Maybe in NZ it’s different?
Facilitating occurs in a student-centred learning environment. The main role of facilitator is to help student achieve their learning goals; help them to find their own learning path so they can learn in their own way, and maybe in their own pace. (As mentioned in
Elaine’s and Kay’s blogs). Facilitator also needs to guide student to get on right track and attain the required knowledge.
Work as a facilitator, there’s less control on the learning course content and how to deliver the course to students. Student needs to be responsible for his own study and should develop self motivation to catch up with the course and finally complete the course.
The least control in study occurs when work as a moderator. Moderator usually stops the conflict and make sure the discussion is on the right track. I would say this role is more monitoring than guidance and assistance.
When are these three roles appropriate in an online community?
In our classroom students attend any booked session and learn in their own paces by themselves. I am working in the classroom as a facilitator. There’s hardly any chance to be a moderator in our classroom but more chances to work as a teacher. The role shifted between teacher and facilitator depends on student’s learning ability, problems they encounters, etc. As both
Gilly Salmon & Ken Giles (1997) state that online learning can be divided into 5 stages.
1. Access and motivation stage: Students are required to set up the system and gain access to online course.
2. Online socialisation stage: Students get to know the social environment and try to take part in it.
4. Knowledge construction stage: Through interaction and collaboration students start this stage.
5. Development stage: the learner is moving towards becoming independent online.
There is a overlap among teaching, facilitating and moderating roles in an online community. For example, in the first stage I think both teacher and facilitator roles can be applied here. Tips of how to set up the system and access to the online course should be given to help students get everything ready for their study.
In stage 2, maybe more facilitating skills can be applied than teaching skills? The main goal at this stage is to encourage socialisation between students and help them get familiar on how to use the learning environment.
When students start knowledge construction through discussion and collaboration we need to step back and allow students to start their own interaction and knowledge generation without interference from the tutor. Helping students to find their own pathway to obtain and apply the knowledge / skills.
When students become more independent and gradually increase in confidence, there is generally less intervention by tutors. So the role should be shifted to facilitator or even moderator.
4 comments:
Hi Joy, nice to find your post.
As with most people doing this course, you come to it with a educator's way of thinking. I have been trying to push people to put aside that way of thinking for a little while and think about the facilitation of online communities (instead of the facilitation of online learners). In this sense, it is a very different way of thinking about the question and facilitation becomes a very different thing from teaching.
In the meeting recording from last week we talked a little about this. We challenged each other to think of examples where facilitation is done outside the education context. People suggested journalists do it, others said city council do it when they seek community consultation over town plans or issues. In these examples, no one is thinking about a "learning outcome" or thinking of people as learners even.
Facilitating online communities is about thinking of people as people and maybe never as learners.. I hope that through thinking about it that way, we might discover things about facilitation in a more pure sense that will be useful to you when you go back to teaching or facilitating people's learning. Or who knows, you might think about becoming a professional facilitator of online communities generally.
I see myself as a facilitator because I spend a lot of time putting people in touch with other people in the online context, and pointing them to resources etc. I am finding that my blog is a focus point for this, so I am not sure a community is developing around my blog, but it is certainly a hub at the center of a network.
Great thinking here, Joy. I hope you continue to post as you work your way through the course.
Thx guys for your valuable feedback.
Leigh: Yes, I always thinking it assumming facilitating or moderating happened in a learning environment. Maybe need more thinking about it.
Sarah: I found the most interesting part for me, maybe hard part too, is to connect people together, encourage them to be more active. Although I am not that active in this paper. Lol...
Jeffrey: Thx for your encourage. I am still strugling try to gettting their by more reading and research ^_^
Post a Comment